Modular Monolith E-commerce

Review Guide

This page helps reviewers inspect the repository quickly and intentionally. It gives different paths for recruiters, hiring managers, engineering managers, and hands-on engineers depending on how much time they have.

Suggested Review Paths

Reviewer Time Start Here What to Check
Recruiter / HR 2-5 minutes Dashboard and README Project purpose, tech stack, CI badge, documentation links, and GitHub Pages site.
Engineering Manager 5-10 minutes Architecture, Business Flow, and Trade-offs Whether the design is pragmatic, documented, testable, and easy to explain.
Senior Engineer / Architect 15-30 minutes Source modules, ADR index, Coverage Report, and Test Report Module boundaries, event flow, persistence rules, tests, and generated documentation.
Hands-on Local Review 30-45 minutes User Guide Build behavior, integration tests, API behavior, and local developer experience.

Recruiter / HR Review

Start with the dashboard and README. The important signal is not that this is a large system, but that it is organized like a serious backend project: clear purpose, visible CI, public documentation, generated API reference, and a small but realistic e-commerce domain.

Look for:

Engineering Manager Review

Read the architecture, business flow, trade-offs, and ADR index. This path shows how the project balances engineering discipline with scope control.

Look for:

Senior Engineer / Architect Review

Inspect the source modules and tests. The strongest architecture signals are enforceable boundaries, narrow shared abstractions, internal Spring eventing, Flyway-managed persistence, and Testcontainers-backed integration tests.

Focus areas:

Files and areas worth checking:

What To Look For In Tests

The test suite is meant to prove behavior and architecture, not only line coverage.

Hands-on Local Review

Use the User Guide for the operational workflow. A deep-dive reviewer should run mvn clean verify with Docker available, start the application, exercise the public API, and compare observed behavior with the OpenAPI reference and integration tests.

What This Project Is Not

This is a portfolio-quality, production-minded modular monolith. It is not a full production commerce platform.

It intentionally does not include:

Those omissions are deliberate scope choices. The project focuses on clear backend boundaries, persistence discipline, testability, documentation, and CI/CD maturity without adding distributed-system complexity that the domain does not need.

Final Recommendation

For a quick review, check the dashboard and trade-offs first. For a technical review, inspect module boundaries and tests next. For a hands-on review, run mvn clean verify with Docker available and then exercise the API locally.