Review Guide
This page helps reviewers inspect the repository quickly and intentionally. It gives different paths for recruiters, hiring managers, engineering managers, and hands-on engineers depending on how much time they have.
Suggested Review Paths
| Reviewer | Time | Start Here | What to Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiter / HR | 2-5 minutes | Dashboard and README | Project purpose, tech stack, CI badge, documentation links, and GitHub Pages site. |
| Engineering Manager | 5-10 minutes | Architecture, Business Flow, and Trade-offs | Whether the design is pragmatic, documented, testable, and easy to explain. |
| Senior Engineer / Architect | 15-30 minutes | Source modules, ADR index, Coverage Report, and Test Report | Module boundaries, event flow, persistence rules, tests, and generated documentation. |
| Hands-on Local Review | 30-45 minutes | Clone the repository and run the local commands below | Build behavior, integration tests, API behavior, and local developer experience. |
Key Links
- Dashboard
- Architecture
- Business Flow
- Trade-offs
- Architecture Decision Records
- OpenAPI UI
- OpenAPI JSON
- JavaDoc
- Coverage Report
- HTML Test Report
Recruiter / HR Review
Start with the dashboard and README. The important signal is not that this is a large system, but that it is organized like a serious backend project: clear purpose, visible CI, public documentation, generated API reference, and a small but realistic e-commerce domain.
Look for:
- Java 21 and Spring Boot 4.x backend stack
- Modular monolith architecture rather than a toy single-package CRUD app
- GitHub Actions CI badge on the README
- Public GitHub Pages documentation
- Generated API, JavaDoc, coverage, and test reports
Engineering Manager Review
Read the architecture, business flow, trade-offs, and ADR index. This path shows how the project balances engineering discipline with scope control.
Look for:
- Clear module ownership across catalog, orders, payment, shared-kernel, and ecommerce-app
- Order placement flow from API call to stock reservation to payment event handling
- Explicit trade-offs explaining why the project avoids microservices and distributed messaging
- Testing strategy across unit, API, integration, and architecture tests
- CI that publishes useful reviewer-facing artifacts instead of only running tests
Senior Engineer / Architect Review
Inspect the source modules and tests. The strongest architecture signals are enforceable boundaries, narrow shared abstractions, internal Spring eventing, Flyway-managed persistence, and Testcontainers-backed integration tests.
Focus areas:
shared-kernel: intentionally small shared abstractions such as domain events and exception base types.catalog: product ownership, stock reservation rules, read projections, and Redis-backed query caching.orders: order placement, idempotency-key handling, order lookup, andOrderPlacedEventpublication.payment: listener forOrderPlacedEvent, simulated authorization, and persisted payment attempts.ecommerce-app: Spring Boot bootstrap, REST error handling, Flyway migrations, OpenAPI configuration, and runtime wiring.coverage-report: build-only aggregate JaCoCo reporting module.
Files and areas worth checking:
- ArchUnit rules under
ecommerce-app/src/test/java - integration tests under
ecommerce-app/src/test/java - Flyway migrations under
ecommerce-app/src/main/resources/db/migration - OpenAPI configuration in
ecommerce-app/src/main/resources/openapi.yaml - package-level JavaDoc in module source packages
What To Look For In Tests
The test suite is meant to prove behavior and architecture, not only line coverage.
- Unit tests cover stock reservation, insufficient stock, order placement validation, idempotent retry handling, and payment behavior.
- API and integration tests exercise order placement, product queries, OpenAPI exposure, persistence, Flyway migrations, Redis caching, and payment event handling.
- Testcontainers starts PostgreSQL and Redis for realistic integration coverage.
- ArchUnit validates module boundaries and forbidden dependencies.
- The coverage report gives a quick health check, while the HTML test report shows executed test classes and integration-test status.
Hands-on Local Review
Requirements: Java 21, Maven 3.9+, and Docker with Docker Compose.
Start infrastructure:
docker compose up -d
Run the full build and test suite:
mvn clean verify
Run the application:
mvn -pl ecommerce-app -am spring-boot:run
Useful API checks:
curl http://localhost:8080/api/products
curl http://localhost:8080/api/products/1
curl http://localhost:8080/api/orders/<order-id>
curl http://localhost:8080/api/payments/<order-id>
Place an order:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/orders \
-H "Idempotency-Key: checkout-001" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"productId":1,"quantity":2}'
The README contains the full local workflow and API examples.
What This Project Is Not
This is a portfolio-quality, production-minded modular monolith. It is not a full production commerce platform.
It intentionally does not include:
- microservices
- Kafka or RabbitMQ
- Kubernetes
- distributed transactions
- external cloud deployment
- full production authentication and authorization
Those omissions are deliberate scope choices. The project focuses on clear backend boundaries, persistence discipline, testability, documentation, and CI/CD maturity without adding distributed-system complexity that the domain does not need.
Final Recommendation
For a quick review, check the dashboard and trade-offs first. For a technical review, inspect module boundaries and tests next. For a hands-on review, run mvn clean verify with Docker available and then exercise the API locally.